Forex Inside writes: А не намекнете, где можно почитать подробнее, господа? Translation: (But you will not hint, where it is possible to read a little in more detail, gentlemen)?

Dearest Forex,

I have done nothing but drops hints (all along the way) as to what you should do and where you can go and listen to whence all of this originates Briefly, First, unpack the suitcase of thinks by simply observing their influence and further hold upon the ‘who-you-think-you-are’, and be in as much silence (non attachment to thought) as you possible can . . . listen (by all means) listen to the voice of Nature calling to you.

But . . . you want to read a book to discover the depth of secret wisdom revealed . . . . or, at least, something is urging you to want to read more. And there are numerous and excellent books which you can read . . .

For the superiorily advanced seekers of That which can be Known, ‘the-movement-towards-One’ might easily discover the pure wealth in G.I. Gurdjieff’s “Beelzebub’s Tales To His Grandson.” From this, You will also enjoin the remedy of laughter before you receive the ‘urgings’ of the next design. See It clearly . . . without a single string attached . . . and move only with the focus of the ‘I’ntent. (If time, read it thrice to keep yourSelves open and relaxed). Remove anything and everything that is presently standing in the Way. The moments are arriving. Be prepared.
I hope you all have been enjoying yourSelves as much as I. Soon. We’ll have to all do this again one day. But let’s just enjoy This! Oh . . . and I admit . . . I often times borrow ‘G’s’ playful style to ‘in’form.

Now if you fully Understood the aforementioned paragraph, I would encourage you to take invoice of its contents (perhaps to simply laugh or take note of the carefully crafted and expressed charm). If the above paragraph left you with your mouth open and your tongue dangling off to one side (and you are not stroking old), do not purchase it until after reading a good portion of the 1st chapter in the book store (at least, save the receipt).

For the far lesser advanced, you can always read the Bible (BUT DO NOT JOIN ANY OF ITS CLUBS like Catholic, Baptist, Christian, Protestant . . . and the clubs go marching on). Stay ‘away from’ and ‘free from’ these strong organized influences. They have become far too institutionalized to serve as ‘doors’ to anything beyond what they purport represent.

I, personally, have discovered that reading Bible is incredibly boring. It is like walking in a desert . . . like forr-eeevverrr . . . before coming across the oasis for which you have been seaching. You might want to have a cool glass of lemonade close by, if you intend on reading the Old Testament (I’m certain you will suffer a parched throat from all the dust you will have to choke down). And . . .well, you might also want to have a cool glass of lemonade nearby if you should decide to read the New Testament (for the purpose of ‘toasting-the-golden-nuggets’ you will discover if you have already ‘done-the-sufficient-work’ requisite in order to be able to ‘put-them-in-your-holy-pocket’.

Fortunately, (and you do not realize how fortunately) no such secrets will ever be fully revealed in a book such that ‘any’ could tap the well-spring and drink the nectar of its fruit. And if interested . . . one need only to keep knocking and be willing to spend as much time as necessary waiting on the other side of the door before you become answered. This . . . is not a ‘drive-through-fast-food-joint’ where if the ‘goods’ are not delivered with and in accordance to your fast-moving schedule you take off drivinglike a madperson to the next cause of your unrest.

Patience. Patience. Patience . . . my little grasshoppers . . . If you want to learn to fly, you have to pay very close attention to THAT which lies within . . . and in order to ‘see’ THAT, you must be prepared . . . otherwise you would not see THAT which is directly in front of you . . . and always has been.

22Self Remembering. 26Self Observation. 33Non-expression of negative emotion. 39Non-judgement. 46Understood (hence severed) Identities to ‘known’ formulizations of thought. 23. NATURE
****************************************************

Австралийский writes: фантастика!… ( Translation: fantasy! :. )

(M.R. It depends on your footing and on what side of Reality you currently are situated.

For you . . . fantasy. For the Other . . . fantastic!

If you have not looked on both sides, you have not ‘seen’ as of yet. Will you, please, at least keep looking?)

‘Peep-holes’ are simply caught within a labyrinthian hold of desires.

Unfortunately, the rising expectations, (which–not only–define the exorbitant price tag of achieving the causal ends of the desirous means, but further binds and entraps the Self into the illusional notion of being a ‘possessor-of-wealth’), have grown to such a degree and decree, that there had risen a need–a most profound need–for them to control almost every aspect of the ‘happening’ unfolding before their limited perceptual views.

Insofar as the ‘peep-holes-who-have-more’ and the ‘peep-holes-who- have-most’ . . . it no longer matters so much anmore what side of the ‘fence’ or ‘hedge’ they are preent;y wandering about withi the mire of the overly-grown thickets of the labyrinth’s expectational cause, because they are both being controlled by a most powerful existential force of which they Know nothing (and . . . if something, very little in comparison to That, which can be Known).

The interesting part of this ‘present-proverbial-puzzling-problem’ within which they are currently and seemingly imprisoned, is that they all “feel’ the expectational enclosure pressing in around them and upon their sense of Being. Natually, this ‘pressure’ (as does all ‘felt’ pressure) requires a response. Unfortunately, it (the ‘felt’ pressure) is answered through a crazed reaction (fear and threat) to what is being ‘felt’.

The results of the crazed reaction are the expressed efforts within which these ‘peep-holes’ further engage to protect, defend, and/or salvage ‘that’, which they believe to hold in their possession.

So identified with the ‘illusion-of-wealth’, they ‘feel’ the ‘continual-tremors-within’ whenever they are influenced by a suggestive thought or an opposing appearance to the otherwise. Far be it from their Understanding to Know how to look squarely in the eye of this Thought Being, who rises in opposition to the Thought Being to which they have sold theirSelf as slave.

For though they ‘think’ themselves as masters (because of all the ‘stuffings’ they have drawn into and around them and which only serve to shroud the Truth from the Self), I ‘see’ clearly the Master, whom they serve . . . and a powerful Master this is, indeed!!!

So very powerful. . . that it would be far easier for ‘a-camel-to-pass-through-the-eye-of-a-needle’ than for any one of them to ‘see’ theirSelves clear of this most powerful and wonderous giant, who protects the true Wealth, which lies beyond this incredible Master’s guard.

If ‘peep-holes’ would only come to the Understanding that almost every one of their negative emotions (and the dire need to manifest their cause into expression) are based on accusation: Somebody else is responsible for what you think and how you feel; somebody else warrants the guilt of having done this to ‘me’.

It is due and through incessant thinking (an engagement in negative thought formulas) of blaming the Other, that you gradually (but assuredly) come into a further and deeper entanglement in the folly of the accusations.

Suffice it to say . . . (following along in the footsteps of the unconscious path aforementioned), you not only begin to entrench yourself into a a deeper sense of an identity with and to the negative emotions, but you actually start believing that (what you –and only you–are giving permission to happen within the context of your processes of being, which has been further actuated by the very thoughts you entertain and negative emotions you choose to not only engage and further express) is the fault of the one whom you have accused.

The next stop (which furthers the entanglement into negative emotions and works to congeal the identity the accuser has thus far created with negative emotions) is to convince as many other ‘peep-holes’ you possible can gather into this hoopla of expressed negative emotions (because the weak require an ‘army’ in order to find their footing as the happening continues to unfold). Without a single individual amonst them, they march enmasse and in step to the tune of fully ‘in’doctrinated unconsciousness.

Before you know it, a whirlwind of expressed negative emotions pour into an exaggerated circus of dramatical effect (as if someone set off a stupid bomb, whose gas effects everyone in close proximity to its release). Yeeeek!!!

Unfortunately, ‘peep-holes’ continue to make such simple things so very-very complex because they continue to make everything else important to them except the cause of Understanding and Knowing oneSelf.

And . . . if you did Know yourSelf . . . you would Understand that you cannot hold unconsciousness (mechanicalism) responsible.

And . . . If you did Know yourSelf . . . you would truly Understand why it was once whispered and continues to be whispered: Forgive them, for they know not what they do.

Watch carefully that which influences you to act in this way or that, to behave in this way or that, to think in terms of this way and that, and to feel in this way or that. Do not judge yourSelf. Simply watch.

And . . . if you have a moment spare, cuddle up next to a tree and listen to all it has to share. Or . . . find your way to nestle next to a small stream, and let the pure sound of the stream wash all your thoughts away in its movement.

The sounds of Nature have been whispering to you throughout your entire Life. And . . . the secrets It has to share, has more to offer to your benefit and Understanding than anything you might read (including this), anything you might see (movie, TV, or Utubewise), and anything you might hear (‘peep-holes’ incessant chatter).

Take care to know thySelf.

Obviously ‘I’ have not been in so much communication as of late due to the intensity of the happenings within which ‘I’ am currently involved. But this moment . . . ‘I’ came across such an incredible comment that ‘I’ felt it all too necessary to share it with readers.

Because it was written in Russian, ‘I’ will present in its original form to benefit its author. Following the Russian script of the comment, ‘I’ have supplied the Yahoo Babel translation of the script. Although ‘I’ am certain the translation does not contain the depth and breadth of the Russian verse, you all will get the drift. So . . . without further ado:

Недавно стала всё больше размышлять над такой ситуацией: а что если бы во всём мире пропал интернет. Я конечно понимаю, что инет сам по себе взять и испариться не может, но тем не менее, если опустить все технические нюансы, и представить что такое возможно… Теперь не почитать новости, блоги, не найти нужную информацию в Яндексе, а самое страшное не выйти ни в аську, ни в контакт!
И тут до меня дошло насколько я зависима от сети. Нет, вроде бы целыми днями перед компьютером не провожу, однако признаюсь, день начинаю и заканчиваю и менно компьютером. Хотя, если с другой стороны посмотреть, будет больше настоящего общения, и больше времени на реальные развлечения, на саморазвитие и т.п. Хотя опять же с другой стороны, с некоторыми друзьями связаться можно только через инет (кто живет в других городах и странах, телеон – дорого знаете ли), ну и дополн.инфо можно получить быстро, чем сидеть в библиотеках…
А как вы, легко бы смогли перенести такую утрату?

Translation: Recently it began all more to reflect above this situation: and that if in the entire world the Internet disappeared. I certainly understand, which [inet] by itself to take and be evaporated cannot, but nevertheless, if we lower all technical nuances, and to represent which such is possible… To now not read a little the news, [blogi], not to find necessary information in [Yandekse], and the most terrible not to leave either into [asku] or into the contact! And here to me downy how I am dependent on the network. No, like I do not carry out by the entire days before the computer; however, I acknowledge, day I begin and conclude [menno] by computer. Although, if we look from the other side, more than present contact there will be, and it is more than time to the real entertainments, to the self-development and the like although, in addition from the other side, with some friends to be connected is possible only through [inet] (who lives in other cities and countries, tele-it – dearly you do know), well and [dopoln].[info] can be obtained rapidly, than to sit in the libraries… But as you, easily could transfer this loss?

M.R. If you do not know yourSelf first (and make that knowing your priority), what losses could you possibly be referencing that would reflect a greater catastrophe?

If you pay attention (close attention) to what you read, and then pay closer attention to how it influences you, then ‘I’ would say to you read anything and everything. But read anything and everything while ‘watching’ the effects of what you read, and how what you have read influences the ‘movements’ (actions, thoughts, and behaviors) you make in this direction or that.

If you are moved into anger, then look at the reasons behind the anger. If you are moved into fear, then pay attention to the why the fear occurs.
If you are pushed towards hatred, watch from whence the hatred surfaces. Simply put: Pay attention to yourSelf!!!

Read! Read to your heart’s content if you so desire. There is tons of space to be had in your processor brain. My only concern is that if you do not know yourSelf, would good or harm will all his information amount to or account for?

The same can be held true for the things you watch on TV and in movies theaters, the things that you hear on the radio or the ‘talk’ amongst those with which you are in communication . . . are you paying attention to how all these things influence you in one direction or the other?

Have you even begun to ‘look’ at THAT which influences everything you do, how you act, and what, in fact, you entertain (THAT which you believe to be ‘your thoughts’? Is there any wonder as to why ‘I’ caution you with regards to THAT which you are continually bringing into you processor (brain); into your ‘home’.

Everything you bring into your ‘home’ has its effects upon you. Belittle what ‘I’ say as you see fit, but ‘I’ do care to, at least, ‘in’form you with regards to the subtle processes of thought fueling the cause of unconsciousness and its’ horrendous manifestations.

Thought is matter. Very subtle matter, but matter all the same. So if matter, why would you dare to bring ‘trash’ into your home. If ‘trash’ entertains you, ‘I’ understand why you would want to bring in all that you desire.

But . . . please, please, please . . . do Understand: the more you bring int the ‘home’, the more you have to sift through . . . until you finally realize the ‘work’ requisite to sift through and toss out all that which is futile and unnecessary; until you finally realize WHAT to let in.

You ‘think’ that what is important to know is ‘out there’. But let me assure you, you will never know anything until you KNOW yourSelf and you cannot know that until you step ‘in-here’.

Please . . . do feel free to experience the wonderment. But learn from IT!

Thank you so much for your comment.

P.S. ‘I’ have had numerous comments in a language ‘I’ cannot decipher through Yahoo Babel (backtracks on Communication #) . The language looks like this (Çàðàáîòîê â ñåòè). Please…give me a clue as to where ‘I’ can go to to ‘hear’ that which you are attempting to communicate. ‘I’ have tried (unsuccessfully) to translate you messaging through several channels. Consequently, if you want to be heard, please find a way to clue the way of the language you are using to say that which you are saying. Otherwise . . . your comments will suffer the cause of continued deletion.

Trud-Ma writes . . .

To me it is very it’s a pity, that I can in no way you help. I hope, they will here help you. Мне очень жаль, что ничем не могу Вам помочь. Надеюсь, Вам здесь помогут.

Pity . . . what would your pity do for a ‘me’? ‘I’ suppose ‘I’ should clue you in: Pity does nothing–absolutely nothing–for the person being pitied. However . . . it appears to do wonders for the person holding the thought: “I pity you.”

When you say, “I pity you’, already you have assumed a superior role over the person you are holding in contempt with your pity. You believe yourself one step above the pitied Other (or perhaps, a whole flight of stairs above the Other). Hence, the reason why ‘I’ attached a comment to your comment to read: Pity is a condition of the mind (obviously your mind at the write of your comment).

I pity no one . . . ‘I’ would not dare into such a thought to describe the Other. And it is not the case that daring not to engage in such a thought has anything to do with the Other at all.

When you hold a thought of pity, you are engaging in a condition of mind . . . but there is more to it than simply that.

You see . . . The same can be said if you were to hold a thought of anger, jealousy, irritation, hatred . . . towards the Other. Any negative thought within which ‘you’ become ‘in’volved has a tendency to lend itself to an identification with and to negative emotions. Simply put: Your pity does nothing for anyone, but it does plenty to ‘you’.

At most . . . it strokes an ego. Thus allowing the ‘who-you-think-you-are’ to walk away feeling superior to the one you stooped to pity.

And . . . My dear, dear, Trud-Ma . . . acclaiming that “you can in no way help me” . . . what beliefs are you entertaining such that you would consider ‘I’ need help? Were you having thoughts of saving a ‘me’? If such is the case: Perhaps you should clue us all in: What is it that ‘I’ need be saved from?

‘I’ should only ask you, Trud-Ma, to observe the pity that you are holding and to look closely at what it does for you when you are holding it. Just look. Do not judge.

‘Peep-holes’ get attached and create identities to all sorts of senseless negative thoughts and negative emotions that absolutely do nothing but harm (especially for the ‘peep-hole’ holding onto the thought). Most importantly, they do not serve your better interests, and Trud-Ma ‘I’ want your better interests to be served.

One must help oneSelf.

Dear Green Golfer,

The point . . . the only point of my communications is to illuminate the thoughts crossing over the mind. If they (the thoughts, that is) effect anyone, it is due to the fact that the ‘who-they-think-they-are’ has in some way identified with the contents of the communications in some way or another. ‘I’ have no hand or voice in how words are taken into the processor and processed.

That is my point . . . dear Green Golfer . . . simply to bring attention to thoughts crossing over. They (the thoughts ‘I’ have shared) have nothing to do with this or that. They are simply ‘clouds’ passing over.
The fact that some think them this way and others think them that way is of little accord.

The import is of all such communications is that you begin to look at thought itself. If you happen to be irritated by a thought ‘I’ have shared, do not waste on ounce of energy faulting a ‘me’. Irritations at what the Other has said or done has more to say (much more to share) about your own conditoning, then it does of the Others’.

First, one must remove the splinter from one’s own eye, before it ‘see’ the splinters in the Other.

Some time ago, a Master showed a ‘me’ all the thought identifications that catered to all the me’s manifesting into a multiciplicity of I’s. The Master was crazy-making . . . because a ‘me’ wanted answers, and another ‘me’ wanted to guidance, another ‘me’ wanted to be left alone, and another ‘me’ wanted independence, and another ‘me’ validation and wanted this, and another ‘me’ wanted that . . . and then . . . And then, (almost in a flash) ‘I’ finally saw all the thoughts that poured into the multitude of these ‘me’ constructions, and ‘I’ became very much aware of these culturally conditioned ‘me’ constructions and the thoughts holding these ‘me’ constructions in their place.

‘I’ became ‘answered’ because ‘I’ finally understood what material (thought) went into the design and eventual construction of all the me’s. And . . . then I saw how ‘peep-holes’ use formulas of thought (though very unconsciously) to get at something they want from the Other.

‘I’ want nothing from you. ‘I’ share what ‘I’ share so that one day you might understand how to use thought rather than to be used by thought.

‘I’ have no intentions of harm because ‘I’ do not ‘see’ mySelf as apart from anything and everything. The harm comes from what has been created insofar as ‘identification-to-formulas-of-thought’ are concerned. ‘I’ create something in mind not for you to believe in it, but to simply ‘see’ it!!!

If you can ‘see’ those thoughts to which ‘you’ have become identified, then you can begin to ‘see’ the constructions that lend themselves to a multiciplicity of ‘me’s': the religious ‘me’, the political ‘me’, the caring ‘me’, the not-so-caring ‘me’, the educated ‘me’ . . . me me me me . . they are all fictitious . . . and furthermore ‘in’volved with the drama of so much nonsense that when ‘you’ finally ‘see’ IT, ‘you’ will roar with laughter.

Observe and Self-Remember

Dear Каталог статей,

According to you, ‘I’ have committed an error. Interesting . . . how does one commit an error simply sharing that which crosses over? ‘I’ have described something. It needs not pertain to you. And yet . . . you seemingly feel the need to talk about this error ‘I’ have committed.

Now . . . if an error is anything like a sin, ‘I’ can assure you: No such thing has occurred. However . . . if an error is simply a mistake (like a typing error), then ‘I’ assure you of its possibility.

Moreover . . . if it is within your processes of thought that ‘I’ grouped together all the travelers in the manifest realm of experiencing and shared this communication concerning this particular collective . . . do be clear: that is in your processes of thought and not to the otherwise.

Please . . . there is no need to be offended and no need to take defense. If this piece does not speak to you, so be it. ‘I’ do not need the Other to acclaim what ‘I’ share as that which is right, nor do ‘I’ need the Other to complain about that which is wrong. Right and Wrong have nothing to do with anything ‘I’ have thus far communicated.

And if it did . . . who holds the authority to determine the rightness and the wrongness of anything? From experiencing, ‘I’ have learned (have become very aware) that many things ‘I’ was once informed to be ‘right’ were actually very ‘wrong’, and vice versa. And ‘I’ say: until you see through your own beliefs with regards to your identifications to a ‘this’ or a ‘that’ , you will not ‘see’ what ‘I’ have seen.

Trust yourSelf! If you ‘think’ ‘I’ am wrong, then so be it!!! ‘I’ have no need to convince you. You seem convinced of a something, but who am ‘I’ to make you see differently than what you have decided? You need only look at ‘that’ which has made you decide this way as opposed to that way. And . . . Let that be not only your thought, but your experience.

Insofar as the Others who question whether ‘I’ believe in that which ‘I’ have said . . . what is there to believe? ‘I’ do not have to believe in that which has been said. ‘I’ said it. The end . . . no belief is necessary, no belief is required.

And for those who would like that ‘I’ should consider how what ‘I’ share might effect the Other . . . listen very clearly: The only power that ‘I’ or anyone else holds over you, is the power that you yourself give to the Other. Thus will ‘I’ say in further address: Look at that which you empower as well that which disempowers you . . . The fact is: ‘You’ have no clue, and all ‘I’ am suggesting is that ‘you’ start looking for the clues as to why you feel the need to believe in anything.

‘I’ see a tree. ‘I’ have no need to believe in the tree. There it is, directly
in view. What do ‘I’ need believe? Someone says they are going to be at a certain place at a certain time. Why do ‘I’ need believe them? If they show up, they are true to their word. If they do not show up, ‘I’ find something else to do. Perhaps there were problems. But ‘I’ do not make their problems my own. A time was set. A place was set. ‘I’ can wait or ‘I’ can go on. A decision is made. What do ‘I’ need believe?

Watch . . . . Self discover. If ‘you’ cannot look at what makes you ‘do’ what ‘you’ ‘do’, then ‘you’ have never looked at the thoughts pushing ‘you’ into the doings. And . . . if the thoughts are pushing ‘you’ to do this as opposed to that. . . are ‘you’ not being done?

‘I’ have not asked you to do anything but to LOOK at that which is crossing over. So ‘I’ ask: How dangerous is looking? How is looking at that which crosses over you processor dangerous? Aren’t you a bit interested in how those thoughts got in there? Aren’t you a tad concerned as to why you adhere to beliefs that have absolutely no grounding whatosever?

‘I’ have no power over a single thing outside of mySelf nor do ‘I’ want the responsibility of assuming power over the Other. ‘Peep-holes’ that desire to assume power over the Other are . . . well . . . ‘peep-holes.’
They are stuck in a huge egoic need of some sort or another. ‘I’ watch them, because they are very dangerous, but ‘I’ have as little to do with them as possible (especially in terms of what they have to say).

‘You’ are responsible for whatsoever ‘you’ do with that which is given, whatsoever ‘you’ continue to believe is no ones responsibility but your own.

And my dear Каталог статей . . . thank you for your comment.

Tell me . . . what do you think will result from the actions of a ‘peep-hole’ taking advantage of other ‘peep-holes’?

If ‘you’ are here (in the manifest realm of experiencing called ‘Life-on-Earth’) to simply advantage yourself (in an all out attempt to meet the extent of your desirous fill of acquitions) but ‘at-the-cost-of-using-the-Other’. then consider yourself a culturally, endoctrinated ‘peep-hole’.

Briefly: You have entered into the culturally contrived ‘room-of-want’, but your ‘wants’ come at the cost of learning how to use the Other.

Now . . . ‘I’ will premise this entire communication on the following suggestion: If you decide to stay, ‘I’ may very well show you something you have not seen before.

Continuing . . .

First and foremost, it is important for you understand . . . there are no doors leading into or out of this ‘room’ (that is to say, ‘the-room-of-want’). One day . . . you simply discover yourSelf in this ‘room’ without having a clue as to how you accessed its entrance.

There are no doors . . . how did you get inside? At present, suffice it to say: unconsciousness delivers you into the room. No biggy. That is how all enter.

Interestingly enough, the walls of this room (though seemingly solid) are actually quite porous. This permeability allows ‘things’ to move in a bilateral direction (affecting both sides). Therefore, ‘that’ which stands outside of the ‘room’ can be moved to the inside the ‘room’. And ‘that’ which is inside of the ‘room’ can be moved back outside again. And yet . . . there are seemingly no doors to facilitate this movement.

Now . . . ‘I’ mentioned that the walls were ‘seemingly-solid’ before alluding to their porosity. And . . . this shall stand. However, it is quite necessary that ‘I’ also qualify another characteristic of these walls: they are transparent . . . from the outside one can see inside and vice versa.

There is yet one more characteristic of this ‘room’ that needs be descriptively included: the walls expand and contract in necessity to what ‘wants’ move into the ‘room’ and what ‘wants’ move out of the room. The fascinating part of this expansion and contraction phenomenon is that the ‘room’ shrinks when more ‘wants’ are added, and expands when more ‘wants’ are subtracted and/or removed. Moreover . . . you can put as much into this room as you ‘want’. There is no limit to what can be moved inside. However, when all of the ‘wants’ are moved from the inside to the outside, the ‘room’ collapses
into an Understanding.

Reinterating: Even though the ‘room’ continues to shrink everytime another ‘want’ enters, the possibilities are seemingly limitless as to how much ‘want’ can occupy the ‘space-of-the-room’.

Whatever is ‘wanted’ has the potential of entering the ‘room’. But not everything that is ‘wanted’ actually gains access to the ‘room’, because in order for the ‘want’ to actually enter the ‘room’, keys are required. And . . . Until the keys are discovered, whatever is ‘wanted’ remains only in a potential state.

And . . . this is where culture enters into the picture . . .

Culture will not only assist you in a ‘decision-of-wants’, it goes one step further . . .It ‘makes-a-promise’ to provide you with all the requisite keys to a vast multiciplity of ‘wants’ if you simply follow its guide and directives.

In essence, culture takes you high upon the mountaintop where you discover yourSelf standing before a vast display of ‘that-which-is-wanted’ and convinces you: “All of this is yours, if you simply bow before me and do everything I say.”

And yourSelf . . . buried under a ‘heap-of-conditioning’ . . . can no longer ‘see’ the illusion of that which is being presented before the senses, which have come to dominate the perceived reality. And . . . ‘who-you-think-you-are’ thinks, “Cool… I’m going for it!!!” “All that stuff and more . . . count me in!”

And . . . you jump into it all . . . Right?

Of course you do!!! How else are you going to learn from it all”

Sitting on the inside looking outside at ‘all-that-wanted-stuff’ is pure and simple torture, if you do not Understand ‘all-that-wanted-stuff.’

So . . . before ‘I’ go into ‘all-that-wanted-stuff’ as it pertains to the ‘room’ (descriptively speaking), ‘I’ offer the following”: Denying ‘all-that-wanted-stuff’ (out there) does not necessarily mean that one will be answered (in here). The same holds true in terms of possessing ‘all-that-wanted-stuff’. To be “answered”, Understanding is KEY.

Religions would just love you to believe in their ‘twisted-tall-tale’ starring the ‘wonderful-of-poverty’: Blessed are the poor, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. OOOOooooo . . . You would have to be retarded to think wonderment into the ‘peep-holes’ who suffer under this guise.

‘Peep-holes’ who live in poverty can barely arrange for their “daily bread”, and yet . . . they are being promised a pretty significant inheritance . . . the entire kingdom of heaven!!! Holy Ka-moly!!! That’s better than the 77 virgins the muslims are being promised if they strap on an exploding device and blow themselves as others to smithereens (KA-POW!)

And . . . if ‘poverty’ is so amazing . . . why doesn’t the Vatican relinquish all of its wealth so it can truly participate in ‘all-the-wonderment” poverty has to offer to them in the NOW and the afterlife. Obviously the ‘court-of-the-Vatican’ does not understand what it is missing not to buy into their own ‘spiel’. . . or . . . perhaps, it is fully aware of how effective its ‘pitch-of-poverty’ works on the simple ignorance of the impoverished.

Listen to this one: Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.

First they pitch poverty and then they pitch meekness. Look up the definition of meek. Forget that . . . ‘I’ will assist you . . .

meek: 2a) tamely submissive; easily imposed upon (Webster’s New World Dictionary, 1964, p. 915).

Hmmm . . . first a pitch of poverty and then a pitch of meekness . . . what else are they pitching to get at what they want from you?

The whole enterprise of religion is to ‘sell-you-on-its-ideas’ . . . and the ideas are extremely powerful because they are selling you stuff that you are ‘convinced’ you really want (eternal salvation, 77 virgins, the rights to see God, inheritances of kingdoms, etc.).

It is as if they arrange God on an auction block . . .

“Step right up!” “Step right up!” “You sir, with the ragged clothes . . .” “And, you mame, with the 14 children at your breast . . .” “Have we got something for you today. Yes-siree, today we are auctioning off God to the highest bidder (actually we will be accepting all bids as a means to fuel the continuity of our enterprise).” “And . . . don’t you worry your little heads, if you cannot afford the monetary purchasing price of our God today, because there are other things you can do to demonstrate your faithfulness . . . ( blowing yourself up for our God-cause may just be the option you are looking for)” . . . “We are also offering a variety of installment plans as an option . . .” “Let me tell you about our most popular one . . .” “All you have to do is give us 10% of your earnings for the rest of your life and . . . let me tell you . . . we can almost see you strolling past those pearly gates even as we speak . . .” “Look up there . . . see . . . we’re waving at you and cheering you on for all your faithful dedication to our idea . . .” “You deserve an eternal vacation in the luxurious kingdom of God . . . and, by god (no pun intended), that is exactly what we are here for . . . to sign you up into our God package so you can ‘have-it-all’!!!”

Now . . . quite possibly you are thinking (What happened to the ‘room’?) And . . . if you have been privy to all the past communications on this site . . . you will understand when ‘I’ tell you, “It is over by the ‘tree’ that is still standing.” However . . . for those who are still wondering . . . let us return to the ‘room’.

‘I’ reinterate . . .
“Whatever is ‘wanted’ has the potential of entering the ‘room’. But not everything that is ‘wanted’ actually gains access to the ‘room’, because in order for the ‘want’ to actually enter the ‘room’, keys are required. And . . . until the keys are discovered, whatever is ‘wanted’ remains in its potential state . . .
And further reinterate . . .
“In essence, culture takes you high upon the mountaintop where you discover yourSelf standing before a vast display of ‘that-which-is-wanted’ and convinces you: “All of this is yours, if you simply bow before me.”

Religion is a very powerful component of that which is so named culture because it serves to provide explanations of THAT which is beyond explanation. And . . . for you to know what is beyond this life . . . Well, suffice it to say . . . that knowledge is ‘THAT-WHICH-IS-WANTED’.

You cannot ‘know’ THAT, but . . . you can ‘believe’ in all the contrived knowledges that purport to ‘hold-the-keys’ to THAT.

So . . . you discover yourself in the ‘room-of-that-which-is-wanted’ . . . and who would not want an eternal vacationing spot infused with the opulence of heavenly delights?

So . . . you contemplate: “There are no doors to this room I am in . . .” “Yet . . . things can move through the its walls.” “But . . . I was also informed that if I find the key, I can bring ‘that-which-is-wanted’ from ‘out-there’ to ‘in-here’.” I want that eternal salvation and life-everlasting ‘God-packaged-deal’ with the payment option plan that I see right out these transparent walls. “So . . . where do I find the key to get at what I want?”

And ‘I’ say . . . you have not far to look. However . . . every time you use this key you will have to pay its price. So use it wisely with ‘eye-wide-open’.

The key to every potetial want is simply DESIRE.

More importantly . . . ‘desire’ is all that it takes to bring ‘that-which-is-wanted-out-there’ to that which is acquired ‘in-here’ . . .

Because the ‘seeds’ of ‘that-which-is-wanted’ already exist in a potential state of being ‘in-here’, all that is required to ‘set-things-into-motion’ is the ‘desire’ to activate the ‘seed’: to to inoculate the seed with a certain vibrational potency . . .

And . . . you stimulate this ‘seed’ (bring it into its certain vibrational potency) with a ‘focus-of-attention’. . . just like the sun directing its ‘ray-of-light’ (ray-of-focus) on a new seedingly, so to does ‘a-focus-of-attention’ (ray-of-light) bring a ‘seed-of-desire’ into its fruitation.

However . . . you must take the following into consideration: initially, THAT which you bring from ‘out-there’ to ‘in-here’ through the processes of desire is simply the IDEA of THAT which is ‘out-there’ (which is in a potential seed form ‘in-here’). Consequently, what begins to take root ‘in-here’ is simply the IDEA of possessing THAT which you seemingly encountered ‘out-there’.

Something further you should Understand: There are a vast number of renditions of an IDEA. ‘I’ call these renditions of an IDEA: ‘ideas’. These ‘ideas’ represent the IDEA, but they are not the IDEA itself. And ‘I’ tell you to keep this in mind for the following reason . . .

‘I’ reinterate: Every time you bring ‘that-which-is-wanted’ from ‘out-there’ to ‘in-here’, the ‘room-of-want’ gets smaller.

Consequetly, if you cannot clearly ‘see’ the IDEA ‘you’ want to bring forth into manifestation, you (so anxious to get started) engage into a wastefulness all of the ‘room’s’ precious space . . .exhausting (if not dissipating) all the vibrant energies of the ‘ray-of-focus’ . . . by entertaining a huge variety of ‘ideas’ and not the IDEA ItSelf.

For example: You desire to be wealthy . . . BUT, instead of using the space to clarify an Understanding of the IDEA of WEALTH, you are led on a ‘wild-goose-chase’ by promotional ‘ideas-of-wealth’.

These ‘ideas-of-wealth’ stand to make you ‘think’ you have achieved a semblance of WEALTH, and they operate on others such that they also ‘think’ you have achieved the terms of WEALTH. But WEALTH has not been achieved. What has been ‘achieved’ is simply the ‘ideas-of-wealth’ which circulate in the ‘culturally-contrived-processing-units’ of ‘peep-holes’.

Simply put; “Peep-holes’ are culturally fed and nutured into various ‘ideas-of-a-something’ (wealth being one of these ideas). These ‘ideas’ are broadcast (the spreading of the ‘seed-need’) for the sole purpose of informing the processor (computer brain) what makes for a wealthy ‘peep-hole’.

So you hear . . . and you (seemingly) see all the stuff that needs be acquired such that you (and others) can say: “Wealth has been achieved by this ‘peep-hole’.” And you say this because you achieved the purchasing price of a cool and comfortable car, a magnificent and majestic mansion, jubilant and juicy jewelery, prized and powerful position, approved and audited admiration, favorable and fitting fashions, etc. . . .

Yes, indeed . . . you have acquired all the ‘stuff’ with which all these ‘ideas-of-wealth’ are designed to make you ‘want’ such that you can take account of yourself as ‘one-who-is-wealthy’. And . . . of course, it is not only integral to your ‘desired-need’ that you continue to take into account ‘that’ which you’ think’ you have acquired, you also desperately need others to continue to take into account ‘that’ which you ‘think’ you have achieved through such acquisitions.

The question remains: What have you truly achieved through the processes of acquiring so much ‘stuff’?

Want a hint? Let the word ‘stuff’ come to mind.

If satisfying the criterion of the IDEA of WEALTH meant filling all the ‘space’ up with ‘stuff, then you could say you have achieved WEALTH.
But the IDEA of WEALTH points into the direction of UNDERSTANDING THAT which is considered WEALTH.

And . . .If all you have taken into consideration are all the ‘ideas-of-wealth’ into which you have processed, bought and sold, then something else will be required from you . . . because it is true. . . a ‘wealth-of-stuff’ you have, but WEALTH you have not.

. . . continuing . . .

For . . . such is the case that when One is finally answered, the ‘room’, its ‘walls’, that which stands outside, and that which occupies inside all simply dissolve in an Understanding.

Now ‘I’ will allow for space before continuing . . .

Dear ФОТАВИ,

For ‘all-the-world-to-review’ . . . your position revealed:

“Я бы сказала о монументальности, грандиозности некоторых сюжетов. А назвала бы – “нефильтрованный реал”. На мой взгляд, красота – это все-таки другое: лучшее, чистое, избранное, заставляющее трепетать и поражаться. Можно найти красоту во всем, но всё скопом – не есть красота. Имхо.”

As ‘I’ have gathered . . . unless THAT (which you have defined in terms of ‘beauty’) appears before your perceptual grid or cognitive processes as THAT which serves out the criteria of the conditions you have placed on THAT (it needs be “better, clean, selected . . .make it necessary to quiver and be surprised”) it becomes for you a “heap” which you have further defined as “not beauty”.

‘I’ got it!!! YOU ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN ‘PRODUCTS’ . . . NOT PROCESSES . . . and in that case, ‘I’ am certain to disappoint you.

Perhaps . . . ‘I’ may have been instrumental with regards to strumming you into a quiver after all . . . albiet it with disgust rather than surprise.

Besides, my dear ФОТАВИ . . . ‘peep-holes’ are all a heap: a ‘heap’ of conditioning which extends itself back for ‘oh-so-many-ages’.

And yet . . . ‘I’ find radiant beauty tucked away within each and every ‘pile-of-conditioning’.

All is in process. Hence, alive!!! AND THAT WHICH IS ‘PRODUCT’ IS FINISHED (emphasis granted . . . yelling ‘I’ am not). That which is ‘product’ has simply satisfied the criteria of an objective. It is no longer THAT which you say “quivers”. Hence, it is dead, inspite of who pick it up and shakes it.

‘I’ am an eternal process, and as such ‘I’ will never achieve the status of a ‘product’.

‘Me’ was a product (a product of parental conditioning, educational conditioning, religious and political conditioning . . . ). And all conditioning has an objective: a goal to which must be arrived upon to satisfy the means to an end.

‘I’ have no goal to reach because to reach a goal would mean ‘I’ am finished. ‘I’ am over! What more is there to accomplish if ‘I’ were to say: “I’ have reached the goal. Now there is no point to go any further. ‘I’ may as well lay down and make ready to become the soil of Earth.

Death is not what ‘I’ desire for Self. Self is an eternal process.

Therefore . . . ‘I’ say unto you my dear ФОТАВИ . . . if you see the ‘heap’ yet cannot see the beauty, ‘I’ can assure you: You have yet to truly ‘see’.

Beauty is everywhere to be seen . . . especially in the ‘heap’. Keep looking….

And . . . Thank you for sharing what you (more than likely) considered a poetic resolve!!! ‘I’ fully Understand your positioning, and ‘I’ am most grateful for your comment.

(English Translation of comment courteousy of Yahoo Babel: I would speak about monumentality, grandeur of some subjects. But would name – ” unfiltered [real]“. In my view, beauty – this nevertheless other: are better, clean, selected, that makes it necessary to quiver and to be surprised. It is possible to find beauty in everything, but all in a heap – is not beauty. [Imkho]. Я бы сказала о монументальности, грандиозности некоторых сюжетов. А назвала бы – “нефильтрованный реал”. На мой взгляд, красота – это все-таки другое: лучшее, чистое, избранное, заставляющее трепетать и поражаться. Можно найти красоту во всем, но всё скопом – не есть красота. Имхо.

My dear Russian readers have this most intriguing term which translates into the English term ‘layings’. Although ‘I’ am not totally fortified in the area of the Russian language (not even slightly) . . . after a bit of quick referencing of various received comments, ‘I’ came to single out the Russian term ‘закладки’.

When first coming into cognitive contact with this term ‘закладки’ and its Yahoo Babeled translation (‘layings’), ‘I’ was tickled and pleased by its usage (“It carried off into the layings” . . . “Утащил в закладки”). And then . . . yesterday, an Understanding occured . . .

One of my students complained that he could no longer focus anymore. He informed: “There is so much to take in, so much to remember, so much to process . . . I can’t keep up. Lately . . . everything is just a big blurr.”

‘I’ stood before this young gentleman, gently smiled into his eyes, and said, “I’ know you can’t see because you do not know how to focus on that which is important.”

You could almost see the smoke trickling out of his ears as he heated in anger. “How can you say that? he shouted. “This professor says, ‘this is important’, that professor says, ‘that is important’, my mother says, my father says, my brother says, my friend says, the doctor, the priest, the dentist, the president, the politicians, the grocery store clerk, my barber . . . . it is endless what everyone says is important!!!”

And . . . quickly remembering this Russian term, ‘I’ replied, “Ah yes, the layings.”

“What do you mean . . . layings?” he shot back.

‘I’ moved over to the overhead projector and flipped it on . . . as such, a light illuminated and was projected onto the wall. ‘I’ positioned a transparency of a lesson (‘I’ had previously taught) onto the glass of the projector. Now . . . although one could still see the light projecting onto the wall, one could also see (quite clearly and legibly) the printed version of a pretaught lesson.

‘I’ turned to the young man and asked him if he could easily decifer what ‘I’ had brought into his focus. ‘I’ received an affirmative response.

Then ‘I’ proceeded to take a small stack of transparencies (imaging previously taught lessons), and one-by-one ‘I’ began ‘laying’ them onto the projector until not a single person in the room (including this young gentleman) could make a single bit of sense from that contained in the projection.

“Do you see?” ‘I’ asked.

“See what? . . . that mangled mess of undeciferable whatever you want to call it?”

“No,” ‘I’ replied. “You asked me to about ‘layings’, and ‘I’ just showed them to you.

“That still doesn’t tell me what is important,” he said, less agressively.

“Oh . . . . . And who are you waiting for to make a decision that only you can make for yourSelf?