Communication 32
Dear Каталог статей,
According to you, ‘I’ have committed an error. Interesting . . . how does one commit an error simply sharing that which crosses over? ‘I’ have described something. It needs not pertain to you. And yet . . . you seemingly feel the need to talk about this error ‘I’ have committed.
Now . . . if an error is anything like a sin, ‘I’ can assure you: No such thing has occurred. However . . . if an error is simply a mistake (like a typing error), then ‘I’ assure you of its possibility.
Moreover . . . if it is within your processes of thought that ‘I’ grouped together all the travelers in the manifest realm of experiencing and shared this communication concerning this particular collective . . . do be clear: that is in your processes of thought and not to the otherwise.
Please . . . there is no need to be offended and no need to take defense. If this piece does not speak to you, so be it. ‘I’ do not need the Other to acclaim what ‘I’ share as that which is right, nor do ‘I’ need the Other to complain about that which is wrong. Right and Wrong have nothing to do with anything ‘I’ have thus far communicated.
And if it did . . . who holds the authority to determine the rightness and the wrongness of anything? From experiencing, ‘I’ have learned (have become very aware) that many things ‘I’ was once informed to be ‘right’ were actually very ‘wrong’, and vice versa. And ‘I’ say: until you see through your own beliefs with regards to your identifications to a ‘this’ or a ‘that’ , you will not ‘see’ what ‘I’ have seen.
Trust yourSelf! If you ‘think’ ‘I’ am wrong, then so be it!!! ‘I’ have no need to convince you. You seem convinced of a something, but who am ‘I’ to make you see differently than what you have decided? You need only look at ‘that’ which has made you decide this way as opposed to that way. And . . . Let that be not only your thought, but your experience.
Insofar as the Others who question whether ‘I’ believe in that which ‘I’ have said . . . what is there to believe? ‘I’ do not have to believe in that which has been said. ‘I’ said it. The end . . . no belief is necessary, no belief is required.
And for those who would like that ‘I’ should consider how what ‘I’ share might effect the Other . . . listen very clearly: The only power that ‘I’ or anyone else holds over you, is the power that you yourself give to the Other. Thus will ‘I’ say in further address: Look at that which you empower as well that which disempowers you . . . The fact is: ‘You’ have no clue, and all ‘I’ am suggesting is that ‘you’ start looking for the clues as to why you feel the need to believe in anything.
‘I’ see a tree. ‘I’ have no need to believe in the tree. There it is, directly
in view. What do ‘I’ need believe? Someone says they are going to be at a certain place at a certain time. Why do ‘I’ need believe them? If they show up, they are true to their word. If they do not show up, ‘I’ find something else to do. Perhaps there were problems. But ‘I’ do not make their problems my own. A time was set. A place was set. ‘I’ can wait or ‘I’ can go on. A decision is made. What do ‘I’ need believe?
Watch . . . . Self discover. If ‘you’ cannot look at what makes you ‘do’ what ‘you’ ‘do’, then ‘you’ have never looked at the thoughts pushing ‘you’ into the doings. And . . . if the thoughts are pushing ‘you’ to do this as opposed to that. . . are ‘you’ not being done?
‘I’ have not asked you to do anything but to LOOK at that which is crossing over. So ‘I’ ask: How dangerous is looking? How is looking at that which crosses over you processor dangerous? Aren’t you a bit interested in how those thoughts got in there? Aren’t you a tad concerned as to why you adhere to beliefs that have absolutely no grounding whatosever?
‘I’ have no power over a single thing outside of mySelf nor do ‘I’ want the responsibility of assuming power over the Other. ‘Peep-holes’ that desire to assume power over the Other are . . . well . . . ‘peep-holes.’
They are stuck in a huge egoic need of some sort or another. ‘I’ watch them, because they are very dangerous, but ‘I’ have as little to do with them as possible (especially in terms of what they have to say).
‘You’ are responsible for whatsoever ‘you’ do with that which is given, whatsoever ‘you’ continue to believe is no ones responsibility but your own.
And my dear Каталог статей . . . thank you for your comment.
January 28th, 2010 at 3:17 pm
You made a good point, but have you thought about how it’d affect different people? I do not say you are wrong, I just need to indicate that there’s more than 1 side to this story. (M.R. There is only one side to the story from whence I see. However . . . there are -just as well- endless possibilities as to how the story can be interpreted. And that is what makes it all so interesting).
January 29th, 2010 at 12:58 pm
I’m still a little unclear on your post here. Do you actually believe this? I do not say you’re wrong, but you will have to create a good argument in order to convince people that you are right.
January 29th, 2010 at 1:39 pm
Don’t you think it might be smart to consider carefully about this? That is not saying you’re incorrect, but when you say things like this, it should upset some people. And I speculate if you’ve given thought to the other side of this statement.